Recent discussions
-
Rita de Cassia Silveira
Level of initial supplemental oxygen delivered: according gestational age and for extreme preterm ( less than 28 wks GA. My suggestion is
- 31% to 50%
-
Daniela MEDEIROS
I agree starting with a lower oxygen concentration (21-30%) for preterms with more than 32 weeks
-
Angela Viau
In my country there are no personnel trained to use this POCUS technology, there are few doctors who know how to use it, in addition, in my point of view a lot of time is lost in resuscitation and can damage brain injuries.
-
marije hogeveen
Can you provide us with the search strategie used so we can check whether relevant new literature has been published for the ERC updates?
thank you in advance
-
Deepa Santhosh
Nice topic
-
Clément Derkenne
Although this item (BLS 2212) has been updated on November 11th, 2024, It seems surprising not to see in this topic the de Graaf studies (10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.01.003.) and ours (10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110292). Both looked at technologies that analyze electrical rhythms during chest compressions. Both algorithms used these technologies either to extend the duration of CPR to 4 min if a non-shockable rhythm was detected (de Graaf et al.) or to shorten the duration of CPR to 1 min if a shockable rhythm was detected (Derkenne et al.). I might make sense that ILCOR positions it-self on these innovative solutions.
-
Marcos Almeida
we don’t have acess to videolarincoscope in my city. I never used this type, but i belive that this can be useful and bring benefits in nicu.
-
Janet Bray
Thank you for your comment. There is another PICOST that addresses checking for circulation during CPR. Janet Bray (BLS Chair)
-
Remi Garceau
Good day,
I was wondering if you have any clinical data that would indicate if the resuscitation that occured, if the providers was trained with QCPR feed back or not. We are telling groups like the Heart and stroke foundation that this should be impleted and yet, they are imposing it in the instructor guidelines.
Would it not be more concluent to have the QCPR feedback mandatory on all health care provider AED or manual AED? This would have a direct impact not on a dummy, but on a real person.
A provider is trained once per year with a QCPR, but all resuscitation could be done with a QCPR device and improve the quality on a real life person.
Thanks
-
Anwar Adil Mithwani
Video laryngoscopy provides an enhanced and magnified view of vocal cards on a screen which is particularly helpful in difficult intubation.This method shows intubation process in real time and guide the tranee.process may take longer due to need to focus and manipulate the blade, superior in visualizing the airway anomalies (craniofacial abnormalties)
Lower rates of mucosal trauma.
Less effective in emergency situation
Traditional Laryngoscopy requires direct line of sight which can be challenging sometimes in Neonates.,success rates depends upon training and needs more experiences. process is quicker for experienced.In less experienced person high risk of trauma.
Often preferred in emergency to save life.
In conclusion : Choice between VL & TL for neonatal intubation depends upon provider"s expertise ,avaiable resources and clinical scenario. video laryngoscopy is good for teaching,training and managing difficult airways.
TL remains indispensable in low source settings and emergencies .
An integrated approach using VL as a training adjunct and TL as a fallback, might provide the best outcomes in neonatal airway management.