Recent discussions

  • Виктория Антонова

    Excellent update. Balanced and rigorous. Recommendations allow for individual decision-making.
    In following article:
    Tracheal suctioning of meconium at birth for non-vigorous infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis (NLS #865): Systematic Review
  • Виктория Антонова

    I agree with the recommendation, as the wording leaves room for individual assessment while removing the idea of routine.
    In following article:
    Tracheal suctioning of meconium at birth for non-vigorous infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis (NLS #865): Systematic Review
  • Виктория Антонова

    I think more prospective studies should be necessary to show more outcomes. Ventilation is the most important thing to the newborn, but if the meconium is obstructive, i think it should be suctioned.
    In following article:
    Tracheal suctioning of meconium at birth for non-vigorous infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis (NLS #865): Systematic Review
  • Виктория Антонова

    In my point of view , there aren’t scientific evicences that the procedure of intubation/suction is inadequate. Therefore I’ll continue practicing the current recommended methodology
    In following article:
    Tracheal suctioning of meconium at birth for non-vigorous infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis (NLS #865): Systematic Review
  • Виктория Антонова

    Concordo com as novas recomendações. Tambem não vimos nenhum aumento da incidência de MAS ou HPP com elas. Acredito que sucção rotineira de lactentes não vigorosos após a aspiração de mecônio pode ser realizada uma vez e, tanto a sucção traqueal quanto a intubação devem ser analisadas caso a caso.
    In following article:
    Tracheal suctioning of meconium at birth for non-vigorous infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis (NLS #865): Systematic Review
  • Виктория Антонова

    This is great. I hope this translates into commonsense guidelines that will be taught both sides of the Atlantic in the same order.
    In following article:
    Tracheal suctioning of meconium at birth for non-vigorous infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis (NLS #865): Systematic Review
  • Виктория Антонова

    I agree not to perform tracheal aspiration if the airways are not obstructed. In our delivery room care experience, many colleagues wasted time attempting intubation, delaying the onset of positive pressure ventilation, and worsening the neonate's neurological prognosis.
    In following article:
    Tracheal suctioning of meconium at birth for non-vigorous infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis (NLS #865): Systematic Review
  • Виктория Антонова

    Agree with current recommendations. We have not seen any increased incidence of MAS or PPHN with these recommendations
    In following article:
    Tracheal suctioning of meconium at birth for non-vigorous infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis (NLS #865): Systematic Review
  • Виктория Антонова

    I agree to immediate resuscitation without direct laryngoscopy.
    In following article:
    Tracheal suctioning of meconium at birth for non-vigorous infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis (NLS #865): Systematic Review
  • Виктория Антонова

    I agree with the comments that have the sentiments seen in the above comments of Jonathan Wyllie, Ahmed Moussa and Leeanne Lauzon. The evidence doesn't support or refute this historical practice of intubation/suction with perfect clarity. Given this is the difficult reality, the task force did a solid job and provided a recommendation that supports no routine suctioning but allows for individual use of suctioning on a case-by-case basis.
    In following article:
    Tracheal suctioning of meconium at birth for non-vigorous infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis (NLS #865): Systematic Review
Previous Page Next Page