Recent discussions
-
Виктория Антонова
Considering that the umbilical vein catheterization in the delivery room is relatively safe and easy to teach, to learn and to practice, as opposed to the placement of an intraosseous line, I am convinced of the umbilical vein being, by far, the best choice -
Виктория Антонова
“compression depths >4.56cm (maximum survival was in the depth interval of 40.3 to 55.3 mm with peak, 4.56cm, after adjusting for confounders)” “compression depth ≥38mm; adjusted OR 1.99 (95% CI 0.9, 4.42), p =0.09. In their unadjusted analysis, a mean chest compression depth ≥38 mm showed increased ” Be consistent with units of measurement within the document to avoid confusion. Suggest standard use of cm rather than mm throughout. -
Виктория Антонова
As a practicing Neonatologist for 35 years and a NRP Lead instructor for last 30 years, the UVC access is fast and easy during the initial resuscitation of the neonate. One has remember you are inserting the catheter only 2-3 cm to gain emergency access for fluids and medications like epinephrine. Insertion of this low lying UVC is a very easy skill to learn. IO use Newborn Resuscitation should not be used at all. -
Виктория Антонова
Umbilical venous access should be first line attempt, then attempt at IO access is a reasonable second option for Neonatal resuscitation. -
Виктория Антонова
Thank you for this comprehensive review. Given the ongoing proliferation of counter advice on social media for the use of Cough CPR, it seems that there is a need for public health messaging on this topic. -
Виктория Антонова
My only issue with the recommendation is that it is followed by the caveat "(weak recommendation, very low certainty of evidence). There are times that we should follow common sense. In adult resuscitation research, the closer to the heart that drugs are administered, the better the affect. Also, clearly, intraosseous is more traumatic. I would hope that this caveat can be edited so that people do not just choose IO as their preferred action because "the evidence is weak"/ -
Виктория Антонова
Concordo -
Виктория Антонова
Just a few small edits with regard to the Saperstein study The citation is Saperstein 2018 216. It is a convenience sample case series describing 10 choking episodes in 8 patients (one unfortunate patient had three episodes). The last three sentences of the first paragraph of the Suction-Based Airway Clearing Devices section don't make sense with a single study. I think you mean to say that the single study had a high risk of bias due to selective reporting (the number of episodes in which the device was used is not stated, and unknowable). For that same reason, I wonder if this case series should be treated as evidence at all - we don't know if it was used successfully in 10/10 attempts, or 10/10,000 (the true rate is likely between these extremes, but there's no way to know where). You don't provide a reference to the Saperstein article in the References. It is: Saperstein DM, Pugliesi PR, Ulteig C, Schreiber N. Successful use of a novel device called the Lifevac to resuscitate choking victims - world-side results. Int J Clin Skills. 2018; 12(3):216-9. -
Виктория Антонова
Our service is in agreement with use of Intraosseous needle in situations where umbilical venous cannulation is unsuccessful. UVC placement should be considered first as it is usually more rapid, and in our service appropriately trained staff are available. We agree with comments already made about prioritising practice and training in UVC technique to ensure familiarity. Intraosseous needles provide rapid access in the emergency department setting, and for general paediatricians, there is usually familiarity with their use. Study will remain difficult due to rarity of use. -
Виктория Антонова
Não tenho experiência com intra óssea na reanimação.. mas acho interessante o treinamento e a abordagem..pois no momento da emergência todos nós temos que estar preparados para um plano B